AI vs YOUR JOB

Atlas · C05 · Perception

Visual understanding

Making sense of images, scenes, documents, charts and spatial layouts.

AI Reliable score

5.5 / 10

Average adult level · peak 8.5 · trend ↑ · grade B

Why this score

Jagged: on expert multimodal exams top models (90.6% MMMU-Pro) exceed the best human experts on the original MMMU (76-89%), but on spatial geometry the best model scored 58.5% vs humans 96%. Reliable 5.5 averages strong document/chart reading with weak spatial reasoning.

On the human scale

2Beginner. Recognises common objects
4Average adult. Average adult: reads scenes, faces, charts, room layouts ← AI today
6Competent pro. Professional: reads technical drawings, spots defects, interprets domain images
8Expert. Expert: radiologist-level reading, complex spatial reasoning
10Best humans. Best human visual experts

Future warning

At its best, AI already reaches 8.5 on this capability. Peak results are never counted in the index; they show where the water may rise next.

Evidence

MMMU-Pro (Vals AI)B
E05 · 2026-09
Measures
Expert-level multimodal (image + text) questions across disciplines
AI result
Top: Claude Fable 5.1 90.6%. Benchmark saturated and archived.
Humans
Original MMMU human experts 76.2%-88.6% (note: baseline is for MMMU, not MMMU-Pro)
On our scale
Expert level on academic visual questions.
vals.ai ↗
MathSpatial-Bench (arXiv 2602.11635 v2)B
E06 · 2026-04
Measures
Mathematical spatial reasoning from images
AI result
Best model GPT-5 58.5%; most models below 60%.
Humans
Humans ~96.3%
On our scale
Spatial reasoning below average adult: pulls C05 Reliable down.
arxiv.org ↗
A Definition of AGI (Hendrycks et al., CHC-based)B
E07 · 2025-10
Measures
10 CHC cognitive domains, each worth 10% of an 'AGI score'
AI result
GPT-5 total 57%: Knowledge 9, Reading-Writing 10, Maths 10, Reasoning 7, Working memory 4, LT memory storage 0, LT memory retrieval 4, Visual 4, Auditory 6, Speed 3 (out of 10 each).
Humans
Well-educated adult (definition of 100%)
On our scale
Used as a cross-check on the profile shape, not for absolute levels (single model, dated Oct 2025).
arxiv.org ↗

History

First reading: Atlas v0.1, 5 Nov 2026. Every later change will be listed here with its reason.

Disagree? Send a correction

Why this number?